A new weekly series about Egypt
André's long career as professor exclusively at the "Collège Militaire Royal de Saint-Jean" was only interrupted when that institution closed it's doors in 1995.
The author of this series "Egyptian Frescoes" André Dirlik was born in Egypt and spent the first twenty years of his life in Cairo, then moved to Beirut where he studied at the American University. He later completed his studies at Mc Gill University, in Montreal.
André's long career as professor exclusively at the "Collège Militaire Royal de Saint-Jean" was only interrupted when that institution closed it's doors in 1995.
Egyptian Frescoes part (2 of 19) issued with the permission of the author.
Egyptian Frescoes (2): Tall al-Kabir, 1882
Napoleon in the battle of the Pyramids |
Khedive Isma’il |
The
main reason for this deposition was that the debt Isma’il contracted had
reached 100 million pounds as opposed to the initial three he inherited when he
occupied the throne. In 1875, auditors were appointed by France and Britain to
advise on the course to be followed. The following year, the Khedive had to
cede his entire lands to Egyptians and to Foreigners, to sell his shares in the
Suez Canal to Britain’s D’Israeli, to accept constitutional limitations to his
power, and to appoint Nubar Pasha, a Christian Armenian, as his Prime Minister.
An Englishman became Minister of Finance and a Frenchmen held the Public Works
portfolio. Egypt was, slowly but surely, being taken over by the Infidels.
It was
estimated then that more than 10.000 Christians and Jews, from Southern Europe,
Salonika and Izmir, and from North Africa had settled in Egypt in 1840. Their
presence became conspicuous. They enjoyed special privileges. They could not be
judged in Egyptian courts and what came to be known as Mixed Courts offended
the Egyptians deeply. When Khedive Isma’il was finally deposed and sent to
exile, riots erupted in Alexandria, the most Europeanized city in the country.
Orabi Pasha |
‘Urabi Pasha who had taken command of the government demanded that the
influence of Foreigners be curtailed. Isma’il’s son, Tawfiq, who had succeeded
him escaped the rioting to the Mediterranean coast to seek British naval
protection. A British contingent had, meanwhile, been landed that would meet
the Egyptians under the command of ‘Urabi Pasha. They fought at Tall al-Kabir
and ‘Urabi was easily defeated by General Wolseley. British firepower and
tactics had won the day. The Egyptian rebel to the crown was sentenced to death
but exiled instead to Ceylon. His home in Kandy, in the hills outside Colombo,
is today the Orabi Pasha Museum and Cultural Centre. Next to it is the Zahira
College which he founded for Singalese Muslims.
‘Abbas
II had succeeded his brother Tawfiq as Khedive of Egypt in 1901. ‘Abbas was one
who hated the British. ‘Urabi was brought back to Egypt that very year to a
hero’s welcome. He had been the first indigenous Egyptian to achieve political
and military prominence since the Ptoleme Pharoe took over from Native Egyptian
Pharoes in 323BC. His pardon favoured the Khedive in the eyes of the Egyptians
at the very time when the British chose to make their presence permanent in
Egypt. Lord Cromer, once secretary to the Viceroy of India, was assigned to, in
effect, rule Egypt. Britain had not forgotten Napoleon Bonaparte’s Campaign in
the Nile Valley whose aim it had been to threaten the Road to British India.
The opening of the Suez Canal, 164 kilometres long, which was inaugurated in
1869, made British presence along the waterway the more so pressing. The
British had occupied Gibraltar, Malta and Cyprus in the Mediterranean. South of
Suez, they would land troops in Aden and the Horn of Africa. The Road to India
was thus being secured for King and Country for generations to come.
Suez canal innauguration |
The
brilliant administration of Egypt by Lord Cromer which lasted from 1883 till
1907 paved, meanwhile, the way for a British Protectorate over Egypt in 1912.
This protectorate would last till Fu’ad, yet another son of Khedive Isma’il,
would sign an Anglo-Egyptian Treaty that made him King in 1922 and guaranteed
British presence in the country. During the time all this was taking place,
Egyptian Society kept changing. Egypt, today, owes much to Lord Cromer’s
administration. Not unlike in India, the British Pro-Consul of Egypt revamped
the country’s bureaucracy to suite Britain’s objectives and govern Egypt
effectively in order to increase its productive capacities and pay back its
debts.
The Cromer reforms built an elaborate civil service to implement what
has come to be known as Indirect Rule. Schooling was expanded as never before
to staff his government. On this particular matter, Cromer had essentially
spotted a brilliant mind in one Shaykh Muhammad ‘Abduh. In Egypt, today, Cromer
has been forgotten. Not so Muhammad ‘Abduh.
Lord Cromer |
Muhammad
‘Abduh (1849-1905), not unlike Ahmad ‘Urabi and the thousands that enrolled in
the bureaucracy, be it civilian or military, was rooted in Egypt’s soil. He
rose in society through education and ended at the al-Azhar Mosque where he
graduated as a ‘Alim. ‘Abduh had been appointed to teach at Dar al-‘Ulum, the
teacher’s training school in Cairo, in 1878. He also taught at Madrasat
al-Alsun, the Khedivial Language School which Muhammad ‘Ali founded and which
Shaykh Rifa’a al-Tahtawi (1801-1873) ran.
‘Abduh
had been an admirer of al-Tahtawi, the Azhari whom Muhammad ‘Ali entrusted with
the task of accompanying two dozen youths to Paris in 1826.
Al-Tahtawi spent
six years in that city, learnt French, frequented Salons and Libraries and,
upon his return, the Pasha appointed him Head of the Languages School where he
also translated texts on military matters, geography and European History. All
al-Tahtawi’s books were widely read. In Rihla, his Journey to Paris, he states
that the Principles of Islam are compatible with European Modernity. He added
that one way to protect one’s country was to accept the changes that come with
modern societies. Such ideas were, certainly revolutionary at the time and a
few gave credence to them.
El Tahtawi |
Meanwhile,
in 1882, ‘Abduh who had supported the ‘Urabi Revolt was exiled for six years.
Much will be said about ‘Abduh’s exile. Suffice it to say that later, in 1899,
Cromer saw to it that ‘Abduh be offered the position of Mufti of Egypt. The
Pro-Consul sought an enlightened Azhari to issue the Fatwas that could pave the
way to Cromer’s reforms. After all, had not Muhammad ‘Abduh been quoted as
stating that: ‘’I went to the West and saw Islam, but no Muslims; I got back to
the East and saw Muslims but no Islam’’. Al-Tahtawi could not have written
these words for he belonged to that period of Egyptian history where self
assurance was paramount amongst its intellectuals. They could borrow freely
from the West and not the least feel threatened by all that they borrowed.
‘Abduh, on the other hand, was the child of the ‘Urabi defeat and the subject
of British occupation. He belonged to an age of resistance to all that the West
stood for and offered. Apologetics for the shortcomings of Egypt and Islam were
growing among its intellectuals.
Not so with Muhammad ‘Abduh who, along with Jamal ed-Din Afghani (1838-1897) and Mustafa Kamil (1874-1908), was able to distinguish between the Genius of Western Civilization and Brutal Imperialism and between the Fundamentals of Islam and Corrupt Muslims. So let us now move on with our story and speak of the Neo-Mu’tazilah and of Nationalism among the Muslims of Egypt in the nineteenth century.
Not so with Muhammad ‘Abduh who, along with Jamal ed-Din Afghani (1838-1897) and Mustafa Kamil (1874-1908), was able to distinguish between the Genius of Western Civilization and Brutal Imperialism and between the Fundamentals of Islam and Corrupt Muslims. So let us now move on with our story and speak of the Neo-Mu’tazilah and of Nationalism among the Muslims of Egypt in the nineteenth century.